<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: from XHTML to HTML</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flimsysilence.net/2010/02/16/from-xhtml-to-html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flimsysilence.net/2010/02/16/from-xhtml-to-html/</link>
	<description>a big dark echoing room and a girl trying to fill the silence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 07:56:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeidai</title>
		<link>http://flimsysilence.net/2010/02/16/from-xhtml-to-html/comment-page-1/#comment-49271</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeidai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flimsysilence.net/2010/02/16/from-xhtml-to-html/#comment-49271</guid>
		<description>I agree, whatever works best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, whatever works best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noellium</title>
		<link>http://flimsysilence.net/2010/02/16/from-xhtml-to-html/comment-page-1/#comment-49270</link>
		<dc:creator>Noellium</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flimsysilence.net/2010/02/16/from-xhtml-to-html/#comment-49270</guid>
		<description>Verrrry interesting. I&#039;m kind of the same way at work. People keep saying XHTML Strict is the way to go, but when I work on clients&#039; sites, I use Transitional, just so other designers could use inline styles or other things that wouldn&#039;t work out in Strict. Either way, it just depends on the situation you&#039;re in, or personal preference to me. :/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Verrrry interesting. I&#8217;m kind of the same way at work. People keep saying XHTML Strict is the way to go, but when I work on clients&#8217; sites, I use Transitional, just so other designers could use inline styles or other things that wouldn&#8217;t work out in Strict. Either way, it just depends on the situation you&#8217;re in, or personal preference to me. :/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

