<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>flimsysilence.net &#187; Internet Explorer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flimsysilence.net/tag/internet-explorer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flimsysilence.net</link>
	<description>a big dark echoing room and a girl trying to fill the silence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 00:48:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>black and white layout</title>
		<link>http://flimsysilence.net/2010/08/16/black-and-white-layout/</link>
		<comments>http://flimsysilence.net/2010/08/16/black-and-white-layout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 04:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeidai</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Weblog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layout]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flimsysilence.net/?p=1387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New layout, yay! I thought it up while trying to fall asleep one night. *grin* Again, it&#8217;s a reversal of the previous layout. (Hm, going from black/red/white to bright colors to black and white&#8230; what will the next layout look like?) It&#8217;s another gimmicky layout, a side-scrolling one. I&#8217;ve wanted to design one for a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New layout, yay! I thought it up while trying to fall asleep one night. *grin* Again, it&#8217;s a reversal of the previous layout. (Hm, going from black/red/white to bright colors to black and white&#8230; what will the next layout look like?)</p>
<p>It&#8217;s another gimmicky layout, a side-scrolling one. I&#8217;ve wanted to design one for a while now. Don&#8217;t know how long it&#8217;ll stay up though, I&#8217;ll probably get tired of it and redo it later.</p>
<p>I still don&#8217;t know if I like how I did the letters either. I keep messing with that&#8230; Overall, not as jazzed as I was when I put up the previous two layouts.</p>
<p>Also, why the heck did Internet Explorer mangle my previous layout so horribly? And why did I not know this until almost a year after I uploaded it? I thought IE was supposed to follow web standards by now. Augh! Even with the current layout, IE doesn&#8217;t like how I&#8217;m displaying my, uh, sidebar. (Firefox, Chrome, and Opera all show both layouts just fine&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://flimsysilence.net/2010/08/16/black-and-white-layout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>the lesser of two really crappy companies</title>
		<link>http://flimsysilence.net/2008/04/09/the-lesser-of-two-really-crappy-companies/</link>
		<comments>http://flimsysilence.net/2008/04/09/the-lesser-of-two-really-crappy-companies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 04:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeidai</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netscape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flimsysilence.net/?p=1021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A headline on Yahoo&#8217;s front page: &#8220;Report: Yahoo!, AOL in talks; Microsoft, News Corp. mull bid&#8221; :( I was completely against Microsoft buying Yahoo, but now I think I&#8217;d prefer it to &#8230; AOL. I never really commented on that whole news item regarding Microsoft and Yahoo, did I? I really do like Yahoo (except [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A headline on Yahoo&#8217;s front page: &#8220;Report: Yahoo!, AOL in talks; Microsoft, News Corp. mull bid&#8221; :(</p>
<p>I was completely against Microsoft buying Yahoo, but now I think I&#8217;d prefer it to &#8230; AOL.</p>
<p>I never really commented on that whole news item regarding Microsoft and Yahoo, did I? I really do like Yahoo (except for it buying Geocities&#8230;) and I am loyal to it probably only because it&#8217;s ancient in internet years. I remember not fully understanding the directory they had going on, along with the search that they also offered.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s stayed my homepage ever since &#8230; well, I switched from Netscape 4.5 to Internet Explorer 5.5 I guess. (Backstory: Netscape had user accounts so for my account I had my website, Inconsistent Angel Things, set as my homepage. I would open IE if I wanted Yahoo.)</p>
<p>I do agree with one comment I&#8217;ve heard, that their site layout is jam-packed with everything, but then who would expect a Yahoo to be couth and suave&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://flimsysilence.net/2008/04/09/the-lesser-of-two-really-crappy-companies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>dear Adobe</title>
		<link>http://flimsysilence.net/2007/06/25/dear-adobe/</link>
		<comments>http://flimsysilence.net/2007/06/25/dear-adobe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 20:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeidai</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flimsysilence.net/2007/06/25/dear-adobe/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I love your design programs, Adobe, and respect you as a company, I really think you need to work on your updating products through the browser. I&#8217;ve attempted to download Reader 8.1 five separate times, once using Internet Explorer (but I refuse to install extraneous stuff in IE just to download/install something else entirely), [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I love your design programs, Adobe, and respect you as a company, I really think you need to work on your updating products through the browser. I&#8217;ve attempted to download Reader 8.1 five separate times, once using Internet Explorer (but I refuse to install extraneous stuff in IE just to download/install something else entirely), tried resuming the downloads many, many times, and so far all I&#8217;ve got for my troubles is Photoshop Album Starter 3.2 installed, despite <em>un</em>checking the box to download it, and no Reader 8.1 update.</p>
<p>Go die now please, kthxbai</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://flimsysilence.net/2007/06/25/dear-adobe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>browsers</title>
		<link>http://flimsysilence.net/2006/11/11/browsers/</link>
		<comments>http://flimsysilence.net/2006/11/11/browsers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 21:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeidai</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norton AntiVirus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flimsysilence.net/2006/11/11/browsers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am back! :o I think I&#8217;m getting back into blogging too much. I downloaded Firefox 2.0 the other day. I got an alert through the browser that 1.5.0.8 was available. Since the updater used to take a loooong time to update, I always got the new version through the website myself. Well this time [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am back! :o I think I&#8217;m getting back into blogging too much.</p>
<p>I downloaded Firefox 2.0 the other day. I got an alert through the browser that 1.5.0.8 was available. Since the updater used to take a loooong time to update, I always got the new version through the website myself.</p>
<p>Well this time I could only find the download links for 2.0. I was kind of confused. Didn&#8217;t they say I should update to 1.5.0.8? Why didn&#8217;t I see it? I thought 2.0 was still in beta, and I don&#8217;t download betas (exceptions: middle_man and Firefox 0.8, because AIM and IE were just that annoying). But since that&#8217;s all there was I just downloaded it.</p>
<p>Yesterday, I think it was, I was &#8220;forced&#8221; by Windows Update to upgrade to Internet Explorer 7. I&#8217;d seen links on Yahoo before (&#8220;Yahoo! recommends you upgrade to IE7&#8243; Well I recommend that Yahoo! mind its own business.) but I didn&#8217;t bother to get it, since I&#8217;d fixed my settings to practically not let IE 6 do anything but show me text and images. XD; But since Windows Update was doing it for me, why not? I was too lazy to custom install and disallow IE7. Besides, Windows Update claims I can switch back if I prefer.</p>
<p>(This is on my desktop by the way, I think Norton Antivirus disabled Windows Security Center on my laptop and I&#8217;m not sure if it&#8217;s getting the Windows Updates itself. Maybe I should force it turned on anyway.) (&#8230; Dude! I can&#8217;t view windowsupdate.microsoft.com! What the heck?! Now how do I check if Antivirus is keeping me up to date? edit: I found update.microsoft.com and apparently the only update I need is IE7. Despite my last update being from October 14. How ironic is it that for the Microsoft Update page I had to practically allow all ActiveX options in order to use the site? I have things set to prompt, but apparently the site didn&#8217;t like just that, it wanted more&#8230;)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m probably biased, but I definitely prefer the Firefox update to the IE update. The only thing I really dislike about FF 2.0 (other than the default theme; I downloaded the old 1.5 theme XD;;) is that the Xs to close each tab is now on each tab. I suppose I have to just get used to it, but for every other program I know of (except graphics programs) the X to close documents(/tabs/whatever) is always in one specific spot. I suppose maybe this is more helpful for not-so-savvy computer users, more clear which tab you&#8217;d be closing. But I&#8217;m always afraid I&#8217;m going to hit the X instead of just switch to the tab. ._. Again, I guess I just have to get used to it.</p>
<p>The second thing I have to get used to in FF 2.0 is links opening in new tabs instead of new windows. I know there&#8217;s an option to switch it (I have it set back to new windows on my desktop), I&#8217;m just not used to it. When links open in new windows, there&#8217;s this very visual hint that it&#8217;s a new window (it&#8217;s kind of as if the whole browser has done a refresh, and reloads and redisplays the bars at the top) and that I won&#8217;t be able to use the back button and I&#8217;ll have to close the window eventually. But if it&#8217;s a new tab, I don&#8217;t notice that there&#8217;s a new tab on top until I go to hit the back button and notice it&#8217;s greyed out.</p>
<p>Also, sometimes I prefer more than one browser window open, because each window is a different task. For example, I could have e-mails open in one window, my websites open in another, and &#8230; I usually don&#8217;t have more than two windows open unless links open new ones. </p>
<p>Then on my Livejournal friends page, I have links open in new windows (because I have so many comics images on the page; I suppose images would reload from my cache, but just in case, I don&#8217;t want to keep using up people&#8217;s bandwidth [and my precious hundredths of seconds having to reload the page *snerk*]; also I assume that people don&#8217;t look at my friends page), and I&#8217;m just not used to having so many tabs open in one window (maybe half a dozen), or using Ctrl+Tab so often. Alt+Tab is just more comfortable. (Thumb &#038; middle finger vs. pinky &#038; middle finger.) But I shouldn&#8217;t really complain I guess.</p>
<p>All those complaints, and I like FF 2.0 over IE7? Yeah. *grin*</p>
<p>First complaint: I see no option to not display tabs if only one is open. I find the tab function very handy, but I also think it&#8217;s not attractive. Especially on IE with this over the top gradient design. X_x Another complaint about the way the tabs bar looks is that little box. I know it opens a new tab (I always wished Firefox had something like that. Maybe something on the bookmarks toolbar? If I don&#8217;t display the single tab I have then there&#8217;s no way to right-click on the bar and click &#8220;New Tab&#8221; and if I&#8217;m feeling lazy and not using the keyboard, I don&#8217;t like going all the way up to the File menu to get a new tab.). I guess it just goes with the <i>I think the tabs bar is ugly</i> thing. It&#8217;s something else on that ugly thing adding more ugly.</p>
<p>Hm, since this is the first time I&#8217;ve had more than one tab open in IE, I just noticed that you can close tabs only if it&#8217;s the active tab. I guess that would fix my problem in Firefox of accidentally closing a tab, but I think it just hampers me in IE. How hard am I to please?! *laughs*</p>
<p>Second complaint: Where&#8217;s the Menu Bar?! *hyperventilates* Oh, I can choose to display it through the Tools menu (menu? what do I call that thing?) What?! It shows up <em>below</em> the navigation bar (? is that what it&#8217;s called?). How totally against my expectations of any <strong>basic program</strong> do you want to go? Plus it&#8217;s in the way! I have to move the cursor that much farther up to use the nav bar! And it goes against my expectations of programs and is ugly and is in the way!</p>
<p>Third complaint: How do I customize all the bars?! I don&#8217;t want to use my browser this way! Give me flexibility, dangit! I want to move the buttons around differently from the way you want me to see them! I want the Links folder to display on the bottom right of the toolbars again! I don&#8217;t want those buttons in the bottom right! I&#8217;d rather use the Menu Bar like I do with practically any other program! I might not want to display the search bar because I don&#8217;t use IE so why would I ever search through it!</p>
<p>(Haha! That Quicktabs thing is such a ripoff of that option in Macs to display all windows that are open! [Sorry, I don't remember the command to call that option.] But much less cool.)</p>
<p>Fourth complaint: I notice that the Refresh and Stop buttons are moved to the <em>right</em> of the url box, whatever it&#8217;s called. Um, way to go against people&#8217;s expectactions of a browser? Or even if people didn&#8217;t have that expectation of back/forward/refresh/stop buttons being all together to the left of the url box, at least let me switch to what I prefer!</p>
<p>Fifth complaint: This ClearType thing just makes the text blurry, in my opinion (in my eyes? XD;&nbsp;). I&#8217;m using an LCD monitor, but it just looks blurry to me, and gives me a bit of a headache. (I&#8217;m somewhat sensitive to monitors even in the best of circumstances; they have to be a certain distance from my eyes, be a certain size, on and on, otherwise I get sick.) That&#8217;s one thing I don&#8217;t like about Safari on Macs. It&#8217;s not as noticeable for me on the Safari though, for some reason. Maybe because of the <em>high definition, high resolution, large dimension monitors</em> that Macs have (and which I drool over XD), as opposed to the regular monitors that PCs have.</p>
<p>(Sidetracking, I was thinking of buying a bigger Dell monitor for my desktop so I can see when I work in Illustrator or InDesign [I've mostly used those programs lately on Macs with their beautiful, big monitors, so I'm spoiled] but the lady I asked at the Dell kiosk said they don&#8217;t sell high def monitors. boo. So I don&#8217;t really see the point of spending $600+ for something subpar, and I&#8217;ll just save up for a Mac. :D)</p>
<p>Despite all my complaints about this ClearType, I&#8217;m sure that lots of people would like it so I don&#8217;t consider the ClearType itself to be a bad thing. No, what I&#8217;m complaining about is the fact that I can&#8217;t find anywhere in the Options to turn it off! <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/02/03/524367.aspx" title="ClearType Text in IE7">What the heck?</a> <a href="/temp/cleartype-option.gif" title="what I see">I knew I wasn&#8217;t blind when I looked over the whole advanced options menu <strong>three or four times</strong>.</a> &#8230; Now what am I supposed to do? Not use IE. XD I just use it for a separate set of cookies anyway. (Yahoo I have old accounts that I check, and Livejournal I have two extra accounts, and don&#8217;t feel like signing out of my main account on Firefox.) Also to check out how layouts look in IE. But then again I use my laptop to code my websites, so I guess I really don&#8217;t have a problem there. (I haven&#8217;t been &#8220;forced&#8221; to install IE7 here yet, and I don&#8217;t want to bother to install it myself.)</p>
<p>Last complaint: There&#8217;s only one um, arrow for the back/forward buttons. Does that thing have a name? O_o This isn&#8217;t much of a complaint, I just think it&#8217;s kind of weird. I&#8217;d have to adjust myself to looking for the bolded/checked/highlighted page to orient myself as to where I am. Then again, I <em>am</em> just using it on the desktop, not the laptop, so with the laptop (i.e. the touchpad) I might be more annoyed than with the desktop (i.e. the mouse). *snicker*</p>
<p>Overall, I think that IE (or, you know, Microsoft, whoever makes IE) is just trying to be completely new and <em>innovative</em> and junk to make up for letting the last version get so outdated. Try to <em>bring back their lost-to-other-browsers userbase</em>. But they just end up overstepping the boundaries of what a browser should be like and should do. Whereas Firefox just updated the browser and added things that <em>their users have asked for</em>! omigosh, imagine that! :o</p>
<p>One new thing I like about Firefox 2.0. When you close a tab, you go back to the last tab you had active, not just the tab previous to the one you&#8217;ve closed. That&#8217;s new, right? I always thought the old way was a bit aggravating. :D</p>
<p>Ah! XD I just went to Customize Toolbars in Firefox and I found a button for new tabs. Omigosh, imagine all the stuff you get when you actually look for it! har har.</p>
<p>And that ends my somewhat ranty post. haha, such a long entry. *shifty eyes* Took me an hour and forty minutes to type.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://flimsysilence.net/2006/11/11/browsers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>layout and comp tweaks</title>
		<link>http://flimsysilence.net/2006/11/04/368/</link>
		<comments>http://flimsysilence.net/2006/11/04/368/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 07:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeidai</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Diary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norton AntiVirus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flimsysilence.net/2006/11/04/368/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it really only 10:30? I feel so tired, like it&#8217;s almost 12. *blink* Didn&#8217;t really do much since the last update. Drove home. Took four hours. Woo. Today I went shopping with Mum and C. Went to Target to get stuff. I got a nice soft red scarf. I&#8217;m happy. Went to Westside Pavilion [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it really only 10:30? I feel so tired, like it&#8217;s almost 12. *blink*</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t really do much since the last update. Drove home. Took four hours. Woo.</p>
<p>Today I went shopping with Mum and C. Went to Target to get stuff. I got a nice soft red scarf. I&#8217;m happy. Went to Westside Pavilion so C could buy a shirt at Pacsun and so I could buy Clinique stuff and get their free gift. Also bought W88&#8242;s present.</p>
<p>Um. Tonight I just spent tweaking my archives layout code. Not the one with all the entries listed, but the single post page. Tried to make it more accessible to everyone, but I don&#8217;t know how well I did. Had to add blank <code>div</code>s to make it look the same in IE as in Mozilla. mrrr.</p>
<p>Oh yeah, I found out how to add more RAM to my laptop (Dell Inspiron 2650) today! The second slot is underneath the keyboard. So I&#8217;ve got 512 MB installed, but only 384 of it is recognized by the computer. I can&#8217;t quite find a complete answer (through Yahoo) but I think it&#8217;s because of the video card which is allotted 128 MB of the RAM.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m fine with it though, since I just wanted more RAM for Norton AntiVirus. Tonight I ran a system scan and I didn&#8217;t notice any slowness in my computer speed! XD Well, I didn&#8217;t have anything open other than Firefox, Internet Explorer, and Filezilla. But my 2002 version would slow down everything even if I just had Firefox open with one tab. *shrug* [Nov 10 ETA: I upped the ram because earlier I'd had Firefox and Photoshop open, and tried to open MS Word but it froze.]</p>
<p>Umm &#8230; I don&#8217;t know what else to say, so I&#8217;ll just bow out now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://flimsysilence.net/2006/11/04/368/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GJ iz LJ omg!</title>
		<link>http://flimsysilence.net/2005/05/21/gj-iz-lj-omg/</link>
		<comments>http://flimsysilence.net/2005/05/21/gj-iz-lj-omg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2005 05:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeidai</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Livejournal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flimsysilence.net/?p=28</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fudge. There&#8217;s an update to the update for WordPress. >_> But it&#8217;s only to fix something with the feeds, trackbacks and pingbacks. (Or so they say.) Since I don&#8217;t use those (I think?), I won&#8217;t upgrade for a while. >b &#8230; I don&#8217;t understand something. On GreatestJournal, they&#8217;ve changed to the new update page that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fudge. There&#8217;s an update to the update for WordPress. >_> But it&#8217;s only to fix something with the feeds, trackbacks and pingbacks. (Or so they say.) Since I don&#8217;t use those (I think?), I won&#8217;t upgrade for a while. >b</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand something. On GreatestJournal, they&#8217;ve changed to the new update page that Livejournal put up a while ago. (Checked past news: September of last year.) <em>I</em>&#8216;m happy, because I&#8217;ve been waiting for it for a while &#8230; I like seeing what icon and mood I&#8217;m going to use. But then other people are complaining because it&#8217;s too confusing, or it&#8217;s stupid, or it&#8217;s ugly, or it&#8217;s too big (that one I agree with, although on IE it&#8217;s not? weird), or it&#8217;s <em>too much like LJ</em>.</p>
<p>That last one I don&#8217;t understand. People keep commenting on that news update entry that GJ should stop copying LJ. Huh? Hasn&#8217;t it always copied LJ? (Well, not <strong>always</strong>, like with their tags&#8230;) Isn&#8217;t the whole system just based on LJ? *snerk*</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t remember what I first thought of the new update page. Maybe I wanted the old one back for a few days because of that &#8220;Paid Account options&#8221; box, and some other things they worked out, but I got used to it. I like the new update page &#8230; I wouldn&#8217;t want any other. So nice and neat and organized. Instead of a plain text list of options that you&#8217;d have to go to another page entirely for &#8230; Sometimes I&#8217;d get the options mixed up if I wasn&#8217;t paying attention. ^^;;</p>
<p>Some people said they liked GJ better because it wasn&#8217;t LJ. That just completely confused me. What&#8217;s wrong with LJ? Seriously, I don&#8217;t know. I don&#8217;t pay attention to what other people say about LJ much. The only stereotype/generalization I know of any LJ source code-based journal site is that LJ is teen-filled with all teh angstness and drama.</p>
<p>Oh well. Yes, I&#8217;m being &#8220;lamezorz&#8221; and talking about LJ and GJ on my WP-based blog. *snerk*</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>Bedtime now, yayayay &#8230; *hoppy* &#8216;Tis so hot though&#8230; (I don&#8217;t like WordPress changing my three dots into that one ASCII character, whatever it is &#8230; alt code 0133)</p>
<p>[comments closed to combat spam]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://flimsysilence.net/2005/05/21/gj-iz-lj-omg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protected: layouty, 5-5-5</title>
		<link>http://flimsysilence.net/2005/05/05/layouty-5-5-5/</link>
		<comments>http://flimsysilence.net/2005/05/05/layouty-5-5-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2005 01:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeidai</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flimsysilence.net/?p=22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<form action="http://flimsysilence.net/wp-pass.php" method="post">
<p>This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:</p>
<p><label for="pwbox-22">Password:<br />
<input name="post_password" id="pwbox-22" type="password" size="20" /></label><br />
<input type="submit" name="Submit" value="Submit" /></p></form>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://flimsysilence.net/2005/05/05/layouty-5-5-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protected: coding discrepancy</title>
		<link>http://flimsysilence.net/2005/03/26/coding-discrepancy/</link>
		<comments>http://flimsysilence.net/2005/03/26/coding-discrepancy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2005 09:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeidai</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pMachine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XHTML]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flimsysilence.net/?p=6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<form action="http://flimsysilence.net/wp-pass.php" method="post">
<p>This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:</p>
<p><label for="pwbox-6">Password:<br />
<input name="post_password" id="pwbox-6" type="password" size="20" /></label><br />
<input type="submit" name="Submit" value="Submit" /></p></form>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://flimsysilence.net/2005/03/26/coding-discrepancy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>showing my ignorance &#8230; (ActiveX)</title>
		<link>http://flimsysilence.net/2004/09/13/showing-my-ignorance-activex/</link>
		<comments>http://flimsysilence.net/2004/09/13/showing-my-ignorance-activex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2004 01:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeidai</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flimsysilence.net/2004/09/13/showing-my-ignorance-activex/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a bunch of ActiveX options turned off. I don&#8217;t really understand what each option does (what&#8217;s &#8220;run,&#8221; &#8220;script,&#8221; and &#8220;initialize&#8221;?). But anyway. I go to some sites and I get a &#8220;helpful&#8221; message via that new toolbar (which pops up and just shifts my whole page down which I find really annoying), Yahoo! [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a bunch of ActiveX options turned off. I don&#8217;t really understand what each option does (what&#8217;s &#8220;run,&#8221; &#8220;script,&#8221; and &#8220;initialize&#8221;?). But anyway. I go to some sites and I get a &#8220;helpful&#8221; message via that new toolbar (which pops up and just shifts my whole page down which I find really annoying), Yahoo! being one of them, recently. The message reads, &#8220;Your security settings do not allow Web sites to use ActiveX controls installed on your computer. This page may not display frequently.&#8221;</p>
<p>Now my question is &#8230; I have ActiveX controls installed on my computer? What are ActiveX controls? I have absolutely no clue &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://flimsysilence.net/2004/09/13/showing-my-ignorance-activex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>what the hell (WinXP SP2)</title>
		<link>http://flimsysilence.net/2004/08/28/what-the-hell-winxp-sp2/</link>
		<comments>http://flimsysilence.net/2004/08/28/what-the-hell-winxp-sp2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2004 00:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeidai</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norton AntiVirus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flimsysilence.net/2006/08/28/what-the-hell-winxp-sp2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This entry is for the Windows XP Service Pack 2 thingamabobber. >b Okay, so I downloaded and installed it and uhh &#8230; I have a headache. *forgot what she was going to say* x_X Um. It isn&#8217;t as bad as this one article that I read said it would be. First thing when I restarted, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This entry is for the Windows XP Service Pack 2 thingamabobber. >b</p>
<p>Okay, so I downloaded and installed it and uhh &#8230; I have a headache. *forgot what she was going to say* x_X Um. It isn&#8217;t as bad as this one article that I read said it would be.</p>
<p>First thing when I restarted, that window opened telling me something was off about my Norton AntiVirus program. The article said it was because the NAV wasn&#8217;t registered in some Windows thing or another &#8230; I dunno, I don&#8217;t really remember (this entry is also proof for how bad my memory is). And that it would be fixed in later versions of NAV &#8230; ? Something like that. Well, Daddy just told me to select &#8220;I will monitor this program on my own.&#8221;</p>
<p>Second thing all these shortcuts and stuff were added (or re-added; I take down a lot of stuff ^^;), that I got rid off (had to remember how to get the IE icon off my desktop without deleting it).</p>
<p>Third the pop-up blocker has a really really annoying way of alerting me that a pop-up was blocked. That being a new toolbar appearing at the top of my window and pushing down the whole display of my browser. x_X I turned that off. I also turned off my Pop-Up Stopper. (Yay! I can open little pop-ups on Firefox now instead of getting a new tab with a blank page! :b)</p>
<p>Fourth, I opened an html page I have on my hard drive, the Lisa Loeb fanlisting members page. That little toolbar popped up again and told me, &#8220;To help protect your security, Internet Explorer has restricted this file from showing active content that could access your computer. Click here for options&#8230;&#8221; I wouldn&#8217;t really have minded that (except for the part where, you know, the e-mail addresses aren&#8217;t displayed because the Javascript spam blocker I use is &#8220;active content&#8221;), but then I went to check out the same exact page online, at inangeling.net, and absolutely <strong>nothing</strong> like that showed up. I was able to view the e-mails addresses. Yeah. That&#8217;s really helpful, blocking something from me that <em>I have on my own hard drive</em> and not blocking something that&#8217;s <em>online</em>.</p>
<p>The fourth thing is the only one that reeeeally annoys me. Stupid thing. I don&#8217;t want to turn that option off, because I despise Active X controls, but then, I don&#8217;t know how often I encounter those. I know very well how many Javascripts I have on my hard drive, though. x_x</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://flimsysilence.net/2004/08/28/what-the-hell-winxp-sp2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

